<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Lists: Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fluentsimplicity.com/2009/01/03/twitter-lists-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fluentsimplicity.com/2009/01/03/twitter-lists-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Strategy &#38; Operations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Edmond</title>
		<link>http://blog.fluentsimplicity.com/2009/01/03/twitter-lists-thoughts/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Edmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fluentsimplicity.com/?p=444#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning the Cape Cod Twitter list I created and I&#039;d like to take a stab at these questions.  I certainly would advocate Twitter offering a better way to find others by interest, location, field etc but also believe (some) people like seeing these lists and sharing this information with others.  I know I received positive feedback on my list (via Tweets primarily).

I do agree that striving to provide an additional &quot;why&quot; component would be of value for these lists.  I don&#039;t see Twitter offering this, but the lists from others could. In my case, I did not include those on Cape who had private updates or very limited activity as an example.  Also, the Cape is different than other locations (in terms of why a list of Cape Codders may be of value).  I don&#039;t think a list based on geography makes sense in all cases - but since there is a very select group here, it made sense. 

As far as business model, it has to make sense but only time will tell. I don&#039;t think I know the answer but the widespread adoption of companies and brands using Twitter means there certainly is something there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning the Cape Cod Twitter list I created and I&#8217;d like to take a stab at these questions.  I certainly would advocate Twitter offering a better way to find others by interest, location, field etc but also believe (some) people like seeing these lists and sharing this information with others.  I know I received positive feedback on my list (via Tweets primarily).</p>
<p>I do agree that striving to provide an additional &#8220;why&#8221; component would be of value for these lists.  I don&#8217;t see Twitter offering this, but the lists from others could. In my case, I did not include those on Cape who had private updates or very limited activity as an example.  Also, the Cape is different than other locations (in terms of why a list of Cape Codders may be of value).  I don&#8217;t think a list based on geography makes sense in all cases &#8211; but since there is a very select group here, it made sense. </p>
<p>As far as business model, it has to make sense but only time will tell. I don&#8217;t think I know the answer but the widespread adoption of companies and brands using Twitter means there certainly is something there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
